|
In a press release of 15 July 2009, the EBB (European Biodiesel Board) provides a complete summary of the biodiesel situation in the EU. The main points are listed below:
In line with the trend initiated in 2007, the year 2008 saw a relatively low increase in EU biodiesel production, and even a reduction in two major producing Member States, Germany and Austria. A clear stagnation of biodiesel output is also to be noticed in a number of EU countries.
With 8.7 billion litres, biodiesel production in 2008 increased by only 36% compared to 2007 (up from 6.4 billion litres). The year 2007 already saw a reduced 17% increase compared to 2006. This has to be compared with 2005 and 2006 biodiesel production, which increased by 65% and 54% respectively.
L'augmentation de la production de biodiesel en 2007 et 2008 n'est pas toujours pas en ligne avec l'objectif ambitieux de réduction des émissions de gaz à effet de serre récemment publiés dans la Directive Européenne 2009/28 sur les énergies renouvelables. Cette situation doit être interprétée dans le contexte d'une concurrence de plus en plus forte (et parfois déloyale) sur le marché international, qui a durement affecté la rentabilité des producteurs de biodiesel de l'UE depuis le début de l'année 2007.
The increase of biodiesel production in 2007 and 2008 is still not in line with the ambitious EU objective for climate change mitigation outlined in the recently published Renewable Energy Directive 2009/28. This situation has to be understood primarily against the background of increasing (and sometimes unfair) international trade competition which has severely affected the profitability of EU biodiesel producers since early 2007.
For more than two years, EU biodiesel producers had to compete with heavily subsidized and dumped biodiesel from the US (known as "B99"). B99 has been sold in the EU with a considerable discount, even at lower price than the raw material soybean oil. Following the complaints lodged by EBB in 2008, the European Commission's investigation established that unfair US B99 caused significant damage to the EU biodiesel industry, particularly in terms of profitability and return on investments.
In March 2009, the European Commission imposed provisional anti-dumping and countervailing measures against unfairly traded US biodiesel. On 7 July 2009, these measures have been extended for 5 years following the approval of EU Ministers.
In spite of degraded market conditions, the EU biodiesel industry showed some relative resilience, allowing a moderate production increase in 2008 compared to 2007. This however stands far below what EU biodiesel producers could achieve in a more favorable environment.
The table below shows the evolution of biodiesel production over the past 7 years in the 10 major producing countries in the EU.
Table : Legal aspects of biodiesel production in the EU (situation in 2002-2008)
| Countries |
Annual production [Ml/yr]
| 2002 | |
2003 | |
2004 | |
2005 | |
2006 | |
2007 | |
2008 | |
|
| DE |
Germany |
507 | |
805 | |
1'166 | |
1'880 | |
2'998 | |
3'255 | |
3'175 | |
| FR |
France |
412 | |
402 | |
392 | |
554 | |
837 | |
982 | |
2'044 | |
| IT |
Italy |
236 | |
307 | |
360 | |
446 | |
503 | |
409 | |
670 | |
| BE |
Belgium |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
1 | |
28 | |
187 | |
312 | |
| PL |
Poland |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
113 | |
131 | |
90 | |
310 | |
| PT |
Portugal |
0 | |
0 | |
0 | |
1 | |
102 | |
197 | |
302 | |
| AT |
Austria |
28 | |
36 | |
64 | |
96 | |
139 | |
301 | |
240 | |
| ES |
Spain |
0 | |
7 | |
15 | |
82 | |
111 | |
189 | |
233 | |
| UK |
United Kingdom |
3 | |
10 | |
10 | |
57 | |
216 | |
169 | |
216 | |
| SK |
Slovakia |
0 | |
0 | |
17 | |
88 | |
92 | |
52 | |
164 | |
| - |
Others |
12 | |
46 | |
154 | |
268 | |
349 | |
604 | |
1'068 | |
| EU-27 |
EU 27 |
1'199 | |
1'614 | |
2'177 | |
3'586 | |
5'507 | |
6'435 | |
8'733 | |
|
|